>>After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured >>1,000, President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted >>down and punished. >> >>After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military >>personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. >> >>After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in >>Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel, >>Clinton promised that those would be hunted down and punished. >> >>After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and >>injured 5,000, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted >>down and punished. >> >>After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 3 >>U.S. sailors, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down >>and punished. >> >>Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, an estimated 6,000 people would >>be alive today. >> >>An interesting question: >> >>This question was raised on a Philly radio call-in show. Without casting >>stones, it is a legitimate question. >> >>There are two men, both extremely wealthy. One develops relatively cheap >>software and gives hundreds of millions of dollars to charity. >> >>The other sponsors terrorism. >> >>That being the case, why is it that the US government has spent more money chasing down Bill Gates over the past ten years than Osama bin Laden? >
Posts: 2469 | From: Anchorage, AK | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
carfull there joe. you may piss off some computer dork that cant see beyond his own monitor.
osama-bin-shit-bag, was never,ever, going to be arrested and brought to justice. he was just another pawn in the game of chess that the government is using to controll its people and the world. do you think that we could have gone to " war ", if there had not been years of bull-shit going on to justify whatever goes on during this " war " ???? this whole thing is starting to smell so bad i can hardly stand it anymore.
further, the whole bill gates thing was a trumped up bunch of bull-shit to take heat off clinton and el'reino. name another administration that had a attorney general that could be accused and found guilty of massive crimes against the citizens of the USA? its just another case of the government using there " powers " against someone who will not march the way they want him to. this is all so madning!!!
[This message has been edited by cramer (edited 10-16-2001).]
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
