posted
Do you want MIN/MAX or just the free-for-all?
Poll Information
This poll contains 1 question(s). 6 user(s) have voted. You may not view the results of this poll without voting.
-------------------- "Rarely has it been so clear how much we, the ordinary people of this country, are better than our rulers. I hope that lesson is not lost on anyone, of any political persuasion." Posts: 520 | From: Shakopee, MN USA | Registered: May 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
I've only had 4 responses to this out of the 11 teams. Please vote so we will have this figured out before the draft.
-------------------- "Rarely has it been so clear how much we, the ordinary people of this country, are better than our rulers. I hope that lesson is not lost on anyone, of any political persuasion." Posts: 520 | From: Shakopee, MN USA | Registered: May 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Any updates on this? I personally am against the MIN/MAX option because I don't want to be forced to carry two QB's on my roster if I only get to start one. Especially with the addition of the flex position this year, that extra roster spot is too valuable to be occupied by an unused QB instead of a TE/RB/WR that could be used at the flex instead. Just my opinion, but either way, I think we need to get it figured out quickly.
Posts: 23 | Registered: Aug 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
The poll is dead even...but I think we will go without it. I'm really trying to find a way to spur trading in our league...but I guess it won't happen. If somebody has any idea on how to try to make more trading happen let me know. We have been relying on picking up the scraps off the free agents pool. We have people who stash players for "trade bait" and then we have like 1 or 2 trades a year.
-------------------- "Rarely has it been so clear how much we, the ordinary people of this country, are better than our rulers. I hope that lesson is not lost on anyone, of any political persuasion." Posts: 520 | From: Shakopee, MN USA | Registered: May 2002
| IP: Logged |