posted
I thought it was an Airbus A300? Maybe it was sabotaged. The security to get IN the plane is heightened but how about the security stopping people from being AROUND the planes?? Who knows....
Posts: 402 | From: Mpls, MN | Registered: Oct 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Fuckin media got it wrong initially and reported it as a 767 when it was really the Airbus. I'm not positive or anything but some of the stuff I heard/watched today seemed to appear that they were leaning more towards a combinitation of the wind blowing the jet wake of the preceding flight into the Airbus. They said that the typical distance between the planes appeared to of been good. But the time between take-offs was not as long as normal FAA regs (1min 45sec instead of 2 min between takeoffs). The flight-cockpit recorded kinda supports this too. Wait an see what the flight-data recorder has on it. Who knows.
Posts: 2469 | From: Anchorage, AK | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
I posted it as my news ticker exploded with info. I think its AA's mechanics. Or just crapyass planes.
Posts: 740 | From: Tranyland Pending | Registered: Oct 2000
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
