The Hobbit

[Jomama]

Idk about anyone else, but I hate the look they are talking about here... Total distraction.


As you may know, Peter Jackson is directing his two ‘Lord of the Rings’ prequels in 3D and at 48 frames per second, twice the old standard of 24 frames per second. ‘The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey’ will be the first major movie filmed at this rate.

Well today he screened 10 minutes of footage at CinemaCon in Las Vegas, and according to some, it sorta sucked. Because now the images are actually too crisp and clear, and it doesn’t look like a movie any more.

Devin Faraci on Badass Digest says:


“…it has that soap opera look you get from badly calibrated TVs at Best Buy.
The footage I saw looked terrible … completely non-cinematic. The sets looked like sets … sets don’t even look like sets when you’re on them live, but these looked like sets. The magical illusion of cinema is stripped away completely.”

A reporter from Variety (via IndieWire) was slightly kinder:


“…a thing to behold. Totally different experience. Not all will like the change. 48 fps has an immediacy that is almost jarring … unfortunately, (it also) looks a bit like television.”

Well between this new clarity and the 3D, ‘The Hobbit’ should be just like going to a super elaborate LARP battle, complete with me calling everyone in a costume a fag.

[Kyrillian]

I was upset to see this as well. I hate the way those TVs look in Best Buy. The TV I got looked like that and took a while to get it to look normal. It just doesn't look right!

[Klaus]

I am sure they will figure out how to tame it down before release. But I would like to see the 48fps version to see the advance in technology. I would think it's 24fps to each eye to get the smooth motion and no flicker.... but it seems like it's 48fps for both so I am confused.

[Klaus]

Seriously....wtf


When asked at Comic-Con if he was considering turning his adaptation of The Hobbit into a trilogy of movies, Peter Jackson told reporters that those 'discussions were ongoing' and that he was currently 'talking to the studio about some of the material we can't film and we've asking them if we can do a bit more filming'

According to the Hollywood Reporter those discussions have heated up since San Diego last weekend and the production team is scrambling to prepare a budget and schedule for filming footage to round out a third film. Will this make The Hobbit another unnecessary trilogy? (Check out the gallery above to see others)


It's not surprise that studios would want the New Zealand director to mirror the success of his first Lord of the Rings trilogy (the films earned $2.9 billion worldwide), but it raises concerns that the source material may be getting stretched too thin to accomodate a new set of three films. Jackson was able to make due with one movie per book for the first set of films (despite Return of the King's eternal running time), so it makes sense he'd be able to manage to do the same for The Hobbit. One book-one movie, right? Or at the very least one book-two movies. I mean, we don't want another Deathly Hallows - Part 1 on our hands here. But if there's one thing you can count on in Hollywood, it's studios finding any way possible to squeeze another few dollars out of your wallets.

The first chapter, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, travels from Middle-Earth to cinemas on December 14th.

Source (http://egotastic.com/2012/07/peter-jackson-wants-to-take-more-of-your-money-by-splitting-the-hobbit-into-a-trilogy/#more-1575181)

[Jomama]

That quote leaves out a key piece of info. He's not just making stuff up to stretch the movies, he has rights to the Silmarillion as well and wanted to incorporate parts of that into the story line, parts that give backstory and details...

[Klaus]

It's fine but I just don't think the hobbit needs 6 hours to tell (even with back story). You can read the book in that amount of time...

[Chadwick]

Six? I'm sure it will be 7.5 for theatres cut, again, down from 3 hour extended editions that will have everyone buying the DVD boxed sets for $100 again.

[Jomama]

I want it to be as long as it needs to be to tell the story as found in the books, and if he wants to throw stuff in from the Silmarillion, thats cool too..

I never re-watch the theater release of the LOR, the Dir Cuts are sooo much better...


....first world problems... lol

[Chadwick]

lol, yes

Now you know how us A Song of Ice and Fire readers feel!

[Klaus]

lol, yes

Now you know how us A Song of Ice and Fire readers feel!

Exactly!

[Jomama]

Um.. nope..

[Klaus]

You ever try to read the Silmarillion? I did. It's a gambling mess that is 10x harder to follow compared to SIF.

[Jomama]

Yes, thats why it would be cool if someone put some relevant/exciting/interesting parts of it in the movie...

[Klaus]

New

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/b1SJ7yaa7cI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[Jomama]

I give it a meh, not exactly bad, but not very good either. It just wasn't that original, and the things they added (white orc, stone giants fighting) are just fluff filler, no real substance. An despite seeing a DVD screener copy, the sets still had that 48fps feel to them, didn't look real. Little too cheesy for my tastes.

[Klaus]

I didn't hate it. Parts were quite entertaining but yeah lots of filler to make the 3 movies from one short book. I would like to see it in 3D Blu Ray when released before I decide how good or bad the CGI was. The screener was only 720x320 and yes had soap opera effect that I doubt will be in the 60p Blu Ray.

[Klaus]

Watched the 3D Blu Ray and it was very very good CGI and the 3D was well done (probably because it was filmed with 3D cameras instead of done in post production). No soap opera effect at all. Only the part with the troll king was goofy and Jar Jar like that took me out of the movie.

[Klaus]

Don't remember Legolas in the book...

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/OsKRzJkDiyg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[Chadwick]

He wasn't in the book, he is serving for another character. But it is his elf "tribe" or whatever so not that far fetched.

[Klaus]

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/mbOEknbi4gQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[Jomama]

BOOOOOOOO!!!!! SO FUCKING BAD... :mad:

[Klaus]

I liked it. Legolas was soooo dreamy

[Jomama]

I liked it. Legolas was soooo dreamy

See... you cant even say that with a straight face.....

I mean really, before this was made, who was thinking... "Gee, I really think what a movie adaption of The Hobbit needs is some interspecies romance.."

/bangs-head-into-wall...

[Jomama]

http://youtu.be/nJOSAwNzyi4
lol